Against Homosexuality

“Gib auf nur deine Tücke

Den Fisch betrügst du nicht." Fischerweise, Schubert, 1826.

(Give up your foolish trick'ry this fish you cannot cheat.)

For those homosexuals themselves and their straight friends who appear to understand their homosexuality, it is extremely hard to accept that man and woman are the only two sexes created by God. They may be asking or putting into question that truth saying, "What if there are other genders that exist apart from man and woman?" As an analyst it is so inconceivable that other genders exist because gender identity can only be distinguished upon seeing human features that were classified as to that of man (ex. penis or Adam's apple as commonplace features) and as to that of woman (ex. vagina and unusual amount of breast as commonplace features) which can be empirically observed even at a glance and it is an infallible truth about what composes a man and a woman.

Now we go on to the super hard part of any human drama: which is the gender identity of anyone who may not classify himself as man or woman or both. It is a bitter stupidity for me that this worst drama ever is not a problem where matter of factly it is, both on these homosexuals themselves and to straight people such as myself. 

As a self proclaimed actor, I am able to act as a gay person (my friends can testify to that) and make my voice effeminate like a common out and proud gay does. Upon introspection, I thought I will pass a gay test if ever one exists, except that I do not and never will have a love and affection or crush towards men unlike what I have towards women.

So introspectively speaking, I may assume a gay expression and proclaim to the world that I am indeed gay as far as my feelings I feel is concerned towards men of the same gender. Feelings! That's the very word! To homos and their not-so-bright straight friends, gender can be identified based on feelings which I strongly believe as a stupidity indeed an animal or a mosquito could never commit.

Like the one I said in the first paragraph, gender is observable and infallibly speaking, it will always be. At the hearing of the voice; at the sight of built of the body, of the legs, of the buttocks, of the arms, of the neck, of the waist, of the back, of the chest, of the shoulders, of the face, of all the hairs of the person, of all the person's muscles and how proportioned are these to the body or the amount of these on a given body part or the used muscles on the wrist down to the hands together with the bones, of the complexion, or any unmentioned that comprises a human body - after having these together as a complete image within even on a singular eye - one can arrive at the answer about what a person is, even at a glance or hearing of voice, within a half of a second or so, that what he sees or hears are the constitutions of either of a man or of a woman. But if the circumstances is devious, as an observer and analyst such as myself could never be deceived nor an ordinary seeker of truth, if one changes into another everything about his gender, even if it appears perfectly operated, still, very sooner or later the original gender will be revealed, even to the point of a sharp investigation of the properties of the person that must always remain hidden by the use of clothes.

Gender identification is the collection of facts of the human body part and this includes the sexual organs which were two matters so singular to each differences yet almost speaks everything about the one who has only one of these two. That is why a gender indentity based on feelings is a stupidity and a delusion and you are obliged to believe so if you have many things to do with your life I mean, if you want to stop becoming ignorant, stupid. But why cannot we or should I say never we should accept feelings that may contribute to the gender identity or sexual orientation of a person? 

Well it is because, aside from the common sensical fact that feelings can never change anything on your sexual organ into its opposite equal which is too hideous to conceive, it is also hidden or cannot be seen in any way so as to check and even correct if it may turn false. Yes, it can never be seen but it can be observed. Observation of mine arrives at a conclusion that homosexuals' feeling or the feelings that make them homosexuals makes them sexual machines which devours on the desires of the flesh, and what identifies them is their hunger for a sex void of parental responsibility on future offspring and what embodies their whole lifetime is sex. What I mean is that homosexuals are narcissist in general and their narcissism means love of or sexual desire for one's own body. The other meaning of narcissism which I had before has this meaning: it is an undue dwelling of one's own self or attainments, which is apparently different from the narcissism of homos.

Here, if one inordinately loves himself or likely to harbor a sexual attraction to his own body, there is a greater probability and no doubt that he too will be sexually attracted to persons who have the same sex like his.

All in all, the crux of homosexuality is the unseen feelings that were regarded as indicators of gender apart from man and woman. But as I said before, homosexuality and the two genders can and only be observed from an a posteriori standpoint. That's where the detection of the problem lies. This point which I am speaking of is where we must all meet. It must be understood that homosexuality is a disorder, a havoc of identity of a personality. Don't get me wrong for I have acquaintances and friends who were not loyal to their sexes but I do not consider them as homosexuals because they were only effeminate men. Nevertheless, they still have a disorder on their part. 

So these disoriented feelings that tells that a man who feels he is more or less a woman or a woman more or less a man suggest a fact in a plainsight that the GENDER  of a person may not end to the person per se but may be extended to another person where feelings or sexual attraction of his lands. Conceive that stupidity in your minds. Who would have thought that gender could be extended?  Understand this with common sense because it ain't hurt unless you never had it.

Moving on, I am greatly dissatisfied by an association of psychologists (and psychiatrists?) in America and their findings on homosexuality which is not a mental disorder according to them. I am not dissatisfied by the result saying it is not a mental disorder; I am dissatisfied by how they implore or use experimental science in this singular but complex problem. Experimental science deals with accuracy or exactness as much as possible if mathematics is one of its languages. Then if mental disorders were detected and classified methodically by experimental science of any branch of science, why appear to settle for a result which is against this visible problem of homosexuality? Is it just because it is not a mental disorder according to your concensus? I am not pushing that we must consider that it is a mental disorder, but nevertheless, it is a disorder only not mental as these scienctists say so. I am just pointing out so obvious a fact that were neglected especially by them that there is a problem intimate to the homosexuals, and answers or results or solutions as of now were so confusing like these homos, which is and never will be in the vocabulary of science.

Mary Distributist